<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Information Warfare Monitor &#187; patriotic hackers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infowar-monitor.net/tag/patriotic-hackers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infowar-monitor.net</link>
	<description>Tracking Cyberpower</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:00:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>China says it shut down online academy for hackers</title>
		<link>http://www.infowar-monitor.net/2010/02/china-says-it-shut-down-online-academy-for-hackers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowar-monitor.net/2010/02/china-says-it-shut-down-online-academy-for-hackers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 21:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gwalton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Hawk Safety Net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dalai Lama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GhostNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hubei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Mulvenon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patriotic hackers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowar-monitor.net/?p=5560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Source:  Barbara Demick &#124; LA Times

<blockquote>Black Hawk Safety Net was shut down in November and its founders later arrested, state media report. The school took tuition from tens of thousands who wanted to learn 'successful attack tools.'

[....]

"It seems aimed at bolstering the Foreign Ministry's claim that China is getting tough on hackers. This is meant for an international audience, not for domestic criminal prosecution," said James Mulvenon, director of the Center for Intelligence Research and Analysis at Defense Group Inc., based in Washington.
</blockquote>


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pitch was tantalizing: Just a little training and you too could hack websites, earning thrills, power and, in many cases, money.</p>
<p>&#8220;Guaranteed successful attack tools!&#8221; is how Black Hawk Safety Net advertised its online academy for hackers. &#8220;Spare one minute to learn and you&#8217;ll make your life more exciting.&#8221;</p>
<p>Police in Hubei province announced to the Chinese media over the weekend that they had closed down the operation, which state media said was the largest training site for Chinese hackers, and arrested three of its ringleaders. Black Hawk is accused of collecting more than $1 million in tuition from 12,000 subscribers and 170,000 others who took its online courses, according to Chinese media.</p>
<p>Police actually shut down the network in November, two months before Google made international headlines when it said it might leave China after it was hit by a series of cyber attacks originating there.</p>
<p>To some, the announcement now suggests that the Chinese government could be getting more serious about cracking down.</p>
<p>&#8220;In legal terms, these hacking crimes are completely new and only recently have prosecutors understood how dangerous they are,&#8221; said Li Xuxi, a Beijing lawyer, who applauded the arrest of Black Hawk&#8217;s founders. &#8220;In China, as elsewhere in the world, the trend is to get stricter with these kinds of crimes.&#8221;</p>
<p>But critics say the arrests might be little more than a propaganda ploy in the midst of the Google scandal.</p>
<p>&#8220;It seems aimed at bolstering the Foreign Ministry&#8217;s claim that China is getting tough on hackers. This is meant for an international audience, not for domestic criminal prosecution,&#8221; said James Mulvenon, director of the Center for Intelligence Research and Analysis at Defense Group Inc., based in Washington.</p>
<p>If China is going to get serious about hacking, prosecutors have their work cut out for them. On the Web, in magazines and on occasional bus stop ads, Internet users are beckoned with invitations to become heike, or &#8220;black visitor,&#8221; the Chinese term for hacker.</p>
<p>Even the names &#8212; &#8220;EvilOctal&#8221; and &#8220;Dark Security Team&#8221; &#8212; make unvarnished appeals to the criminal side.</p>
<p>&#8220;Most of the members are really young, still students, and they are drawn by the mystique of being a hacker,&#8221; said a well-known Chinese hacker who goes by the name Lyon.</p>
<p>&#8220;China&#8217;s Internet security is still very weak, so it is a hothouse environment for nurturing these kinds of businesses.&#8221;</p>
<p>Some hacker networks say they provide a service by hacking into websites and then selling their services to bolster security for those same sites.</p>
<p>But other groups teach how to break into financial accounts to steal money or how to disable websites of competitors.</p>
<p>Some claim their motives are purely political.</p>
<p>&#8220;We are the real patriotic youth. We&#8217;ll target anti-China websites across the nation and send it as a birthday gift to our country,&#8221; boasted a website called 2009.90, which, when opened, showed an image of a fluttering Chinese flag.</p>
<p>One of the difficulties in cracking down on hackers is their level of acceptance in society. Top Chinese hackers hold a yearly conference in Beijing under the name Xcon.</p>
<p>Moreover, some cyber warfare experts have accused the Chinese government of sponsoring the more sophisticated attacks, such as those against human rights groups and political adversaries like the Dalai Lama, Tibet&#8217;s exiled spiritual leader.</p>
<p>Black Hawk and other academies, says Mulvenon, have not been implicated in the major attacks.</p>
<p>&#8220;These academies like Black Hawk are primarily moneymaking ventures, like self-help schools for people who want to better themselves,&#8221; said Mulvenon.</p>
<p>The Black Hawk site started up in 2005 in Xuchang, a Henan province city bordering Hubei. It first came to the attention of authorities in 2007 when an Internet cafe owner complained that his Internet service mysteriously stopped working and that somebody was demanding more than $1,000 to restore it, according to a report in the Hubei provincial newspaper.</p>
<p>Eventually, police arrested the perpetrators and traced the attack back to Black Hawk.</p>
<p>Offices rented by the company were raided in late November. Two of the founders of Black Hawk were arrested in December and a third man in January, according to the official Chinese media.</p>
<p>Although Black Hawk&#8217;s original website was taken down, it appears that a new one has been set up under a different address. And memberssay they don&#8217;t believe the bust will make a dent in China&#8217;s hacking culture.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m not worried about Black Hawk being taken down at all,&#8221; Zhang Quanhua, a 46-year-old website designer, said in an e-mail interview. He said he was using the site to brush up his computer skills.</p>
<p>&#8220;There are tons of similar forums just like Black Hawk. Any forums that broke the law will be taken down, but they&#8217;ll be OK as long as they are not hacking for profit.&#8221;</p>
<p>barbara.demick@ latimes.com</p>
<p>Tommy Yang of The Times&#8217; Beijing Bureau contributed to this report.</p>
<p>Copyright © 2010, The Los Angeles Times</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowar-monitor.net/2010/02/china-says-it-shut-down-online-academy-for-hackers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cyberwarfare: The Issue China Won&#8217;t Touch</title>
		<link>http://www.infowar-monitor.net/2009/11/cyberwarfare-the-issue-china-wont-touch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowar-monitor.net/2009/11/cyberwarfare-the-issue-china-wont-touch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gwalton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberwar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Espionage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Mulvenon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patriotic hackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plausible deniability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state sponsored]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tibet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US cyber doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xinjiang]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowar-monitor.net/?p=5354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source: <a href="http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1940009,00.html">Simon Elegant / Beijing, TIME Magazine</a>

<blockquote>U.S. President Barack Obama's trip to China has a dirty little secret: cyberwarfare. It is an issue Beijing refuses to acknowledge exists, but it has the potential to torpedo military relations between the two nations. Almost every other conceivable area of disagreement between China and the U.S. will have been raised during Obama's visit by one side or the other — even such highly sensitive issues as human rights and the unrest in Tibet and Xinjiang province. But even if U.S. officials try to raise the issue of what they believe is a constant and growing campaign by China to infiltrate U.S. networks, steal secrets and hone Beijing's ability to wreak havoc in case of military conflict, the likelihood is that Chinese officials will simply deny that the problem exists, as they have done with great success in the past. From the American point of view, there's unfortunately currently little Washington can do to change that state of affairs.

"At a fundamental level, the Chinese view cyberwar as an overt tool of national power in a very different way from the United States," says James Mulvenon, a Washington-based specialist on the Chinese military. "The U.S. is still uncomfortable exercising that power, but the Chinese — and the Russians — are very comfortable with the deniability and using proxies, even though the actions of those proxies could have enormous strategic consequences." </blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mulvenon and other analysts say China employs a constantly shifting mix of official and civilian or semicivilian groups (such as so-called patriotic hacker associations) as the foot soldiers — the &#8220;proxies&#8221; — in its cyberwar armies. The technological challenges of tracing attacks on U.S. government and private-corporation computers are so enormous that Beijing can simply deny that any of the problems have originated in China. So far, the Chinese have been able to get away with it, despite the fact that not just the U.S. is complaining. In the past few years, sources ranging from the German Chancellor&#8217;s office to government mainframes as far afield as New Zealand and Belgium have made loud public allegations that they had been the subject of cyberinfiltration from China, all to no avail. (See a story about China&#8217;s alleged cyberattacks on the U.S.)</p>
<p>&#8220;The scope and scale of the attacks has not abated despite the international opprobrium and outcry,&#8221; Mulvenon says. &#8220;It&#8217;s a serious problem that at the moment we don&#8217;t have a solution to, because our inability to attribute the source of the attack fundamentally undermines our efforts at deterrence. If you can&#8217;t identify the attacker, you can&#8217;t deter them.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a troubling situation for China&#8217;s potential adversaries to find themselves in, particularly as, unlike in conventional military training, what China&#8217;s hackers are doing is the real thing, not make-believe. &#8220;The skill sets needed to penetrate a network for intelligence-gathering purposes in peacetime are the same skills necessary to penetrate that network for offensive action during wartime,&#8221; notes a recent congressional report on China&#8217;s alleged clandestine cyberattacks in the U.S. According to the report, released in October by the congressionally mandated U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, that means that &#8220;if Chinese operators are, indeed, responsible for even some of the current exploitation efforts targeting U.S. government and commercial networks, then they may have already demonstrated that they possess a mature and operationally proficient CNO [computer network operations, or cyberwarfare] capability.&#8221; (See a story about the invasion of Chinese cyberspies.)</p>
<p>But even if Obama had raised this tricky issue with his Chinese counterpart, it is unlikely that his efforts would have brought about any change. As the congressional report notes, the heavy emphasis on cyberwarfare is a key component in the Chinese military&#8217;s strategic vision for defeating the technologically superior U.S. in any future conflict. That means conducting so-called asymmetrical warfare, aimed at using the U.S.&#8217;s dependence on technology as a weapon: for example, targeting America&#8217;s network of space satellites or developing missiles that could sink U.S. aircraft carriers. For China&#8217;s generals, though, of all the asymmetrical methods of attack available to them, cyberwar presents a uniquely effective — and cost-effective — means of neutralizing the U.S advantage. &#8220;They recognized the importance as far back as the early &#8217;90s,&#8221; says Mulvenon, &#8220;and they now have a major advantage, a weapon like no other that allows them to reach out and touch right into the continental United States.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowar-monitor.net/2009/11/cyberwarfare-the-issue-china-wont-touch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
